首页> 外文OA文献 >Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAFV600E and BRAFV600K mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): Extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study
【2h】

Safety and efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAFV600E and BRAFV600K mutation-positive melanoma (BRIM-3): Extended follow-up of a phase 3, randomised, open-label study

机译:vemurafenib在BRaFV600E和BRaFV600K突变阳性黑素瘤(BRIm-3)中的安全性和有效性:3期随机,开放性研究的延长随访

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: In the BRIM-3 trial, vemurafenib was associated with risk reduction versus dacarbazine of both death and progression in patients with advanced BRAFV600 mutation-positive melanoma. We present an extended follow-up analysis of the total population and in the BRAFV600E and BRAFV600K mutation subgroups. Methods: Patients older than 18 years, with treatment-naive metastatic melanoma and whose tumour tissue was positive for BRAFV600 mutations were eligible. Patients also had to have a life expectancy of at least 3 months, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate haematological, hepatic, and renal function. Patients were randomly assigned by interactive voice recognition system to receive either vemurafenib (960 mg orally twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 of body surface area intravenously every 3 weeks). Coprimary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (n=675), with data censored at crossover. A sensitivity analysis was done. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01006980. Findings: 675 eligible patients were enrolled from 104 centres in 12 countries between Jan 4, 2010, and Dec 16, 2010. 337 patients were randomly assigned to receive vemurafenib and 338 to receive dacarbazine. Median follow-up was 12·5 months (IQR 7·7-16·0) on vemurafenib and 9·5 months (3·1-14·7) on dacarbazine. 83 (25%) of the 338 patients initially randomly assigned to dacarbazine crossed over from dacarbazine to vemurafenib. Median overall survival was significantly longer in the vemurafenib group than in the dacarbazine group (13·6 months [95% CI 12·0-15·2] vs 9·7 months [7·9-12·8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·70 [95% CI 0·57-0·87]; p=0·0008), as was median progression-free survival (6·9 months [95% CI 6·1-7·0] vs 1·6 months [1·6-2·1]; HR 0·38 [95% CI 0·32-0·46]; p
机译:背景:在BRIM-3试验中,维拉非尼与达卡巴嗪在晚期BRAFV600突变阳性黑色素瘤患者中的死亡和进展风险降低相关。我们提出了对总人群以及BRAFV600E和BRAFV600K突变亚组的扩展随访分析。方法:年龄大于18岁,未接受过治疗的转移性黑色素瘤且其肿瘤组织为BRAFV600突变阳性的患者是合格的。患者还必须具有至少3个月的预期寿命,东部合作肿瘤小组(ECOG)的表现状态为0或1,以及足够的血液,肝和肾功能。通过交互式语音识别系统将患者随机分配为接受维罗非尼(每天两次,口服960 mg)或达卡巴嗪(每3周静脉注射1000 mg / m2体表面积)。共同的主要终点是总体生存和无进展生存,在意向性治疗人群(n = 675)中进行了分析,并在交叉时检查了数据。进行了敏感性分析。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT01006980)上注册。研究结果:在2010年1月4日至2010年12月16日期间,来自12个国家/地区的104个中心的675例合格患者入组。337例患者被随机分配接受维罗非尼治疗,338例患者接受达卡巴嗪治疗。维拉非尼的中位随访时间为12·5个月(IQR 7·7-16·0),达卡巴嗪的中位随访为9·5个月(3·1-14·7)。最初随机分配到达卡巴嗪的338例患者中有83例(25%)从达卡巴嗪转为维罗非尼。维拉非尼组的中位总生存期显着长于达卡巴嗪组(13·6个月[95%CI 12·0-15·2] vs 9·7个月[7·9-12·8];危险比[ HR] 0·70 [95%CI 0·57-0·87]; p = 0·0008),中位无进展生存期(6·9个月,[95%CI 6·1-7·0]与1·6个月[1·6-2·1]; HR 0·38 [95%CI 0·32-0·46]; p

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号